Abstract

Atmospheric models rely on high-accuracy, high-resolution initial radiometric and surface conditions for better short-term meteorological forecasts, as well as improved evaluation of global climate models. Remote sensing of the Earth’s energy budget, particularly with instruments flown on geostationary satellites, allows for near-real-time evaluation of cloud and surface radiation properties. The persistence and coverage of geostationary remote sensing instruments grant the frequent retrieval of near-instantaneous quasi-global skin temperature. Among other cloud and clear-sky retrieval parameters, NASA Langley provides a non-polar, high-resolution land and ocean skin temperature dataset for atmospheric modelers by applying an inverted correlated k-distribution method to clear-pixel values of top-of-atmosphere infrared temperature. The present paper shows that this method yields clear-sky skin temperature values that are, for the most part, within 2 K of measurements from ground-site instruments, like the Southern Great Plains Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Infrared Thermometer and the National Climatic Data Center Apogee Precision Infrared Thermocouple Sensor. The level of accuracy relative to the ARM site is comparable to that of the Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) with the benefit of an increased number of daily measurements without added bias or increased error. Additionally, matched comparisons of the high-resolution skin temperature product with MODIS land surface temperature reveal a level of accuracy well within 1 K for both day and night. This confidence will help in characterizing the diurnal and seasonal biases and root-mean-square differences between the retrievals and modeled values from the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System Version 5 (GEOS-5) in preparation for assimilation of the retrievals into GEOS-5. Modelers should find the immediate availability and broad coverage of these skin temperature observations valuable, which can lead to improved forecasting and more advanced global climate models.

Highlights

  • Reliable global measurements of land and ocean surface skin temperature are necessary for improving both climate and numerical weather prediction (NWP) models

  • The skin temperature retrievals are performed quasi-globally using multiple geostationaryEarth-orbit satellites (GEOsats), this paper primarily focuses on a regional evaluation of retrievals from Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES)-13 for periods during 2011 and 2012

  • The high-resolution skin temperature product (HRTP) shows slightly better agreement and less error than the LRTP when compared to the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Infrared Thermometer (IRT), the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) IRTS-P and Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) land surface skin temperature (LST)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reliable global measurements of land and ocean surface skin temperature are necessary for improving both climate and numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. Despite the numerous products available, there do not appear to be any routine high-temporal resolution quasi-global (excluding regions poleward of 60°N and 60°S) LST data produced in NRT with a single method using multiple GEOsat imagers. It may be difficult to remove all inter-satellite artifacts in any retrieval, a consistent approach should eliminate the differences among the various analysis methods and simplify assimilation and other uses of those data by NWP models To address this need, this article describes the development of a routine NRT cloud and radiation analysis of quasi-global GEOsat data to produce a relatively high-resolution clear-sky surface skin temperature product for both land and ocean. The results of this study should be valuable for the advancement of climate models and short-term weather prediction owing to the quasi-global-scale coverage and high temporal frequency of the skin temperature retrievals

Data and Methodology
Clear-Sky Retrievals
Instrument Comparison
Model Comparison
Low- and High-Resolution Skin Temperature Comparison
Comparison with Ground-Site and MODIS Land Surface Temperature
Direct Matching with MODIS Land Surface Temperature
Comparison with GEOS-5 Land Surface Temperature
Concluding Remarks
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call