Abstract

Expectation-based theories of language processing, such as Surprisal theory, are supported by evidence of anticipation effects in both behavioural and neurophysiological measures. Online measures of language processing, however, are known to be influenced by factors such as lexical association that are distinct from—but often confounded with—expectancy. An open question therefore is whether a specific locus of expectancy related effects can be established in neural and behavioral processing correlates. We address this question in an event-related potential experiment and a self-paced reading experiment that independently cross expectancy and lexical association in a context manipulation design. We find that event-related potentials reveal that the N400 is sensitive to both expectancy and lexical association, while the P600 is modulated only by expectancy. Reading times, in turn, reveal effects of both association and expectancy in the first spillover region, followed by effects of expectancy alone in the second spillover region. These findings are consistent with the Retrieval-Integration account of language comprehension, according to which lexical retrieval (N400) is facilitated for words that are both expected and associated, whereas integration difficulty (P600) will be greater for unexpected words alone. Further, an exploratory analysis suggests that the P600 is not merely sensitive to expectancy violations, but rather, that there is a continuous relation. Taken together, these results suggest that the P600, like reading times, may reflect a meaning-centric notion of Surprisal in language comprehension.

Highlights

  • Theories of sentence comprehension have recently focused on expectation-based processing and the notion of Surprisal [1,2,3,4,5]

  • The present findings provide compelling evidence that the P600 is a specific locus of expectancy effects, not sensitive to lexical association, consistent with the Retrieval-Integration account [26, 48]

  • We investigated the contribution of expectancy and lexical association on event-related potential (ERP) modulations and reading times, and whether a specific locus of expectancy-related effects can be established in the ERP signal

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Theories of sentence comprehension have recently focused on expectation-based processing and the notion of Surprisal [1,2,3,4,5]. Surprisal theory posits that the cognitive effort induced by a word is proportional to its expectancy in context, and has been shown to account for a wide spectrum of behavioral processing phenomena [2, 4, 6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Sensitive to expectancy/Surprisal and insensitive to association, as well as the time-course of these neural and behavioral correlates. “socks” is semantically unassociated to the prior context-words, irrespective of their compositional meaning as an utterance, whereas the other target word, “butter”, is both semantically expected and associated. The N400 has functionally been interpreted as reflecting semantic integration [23,24,25], lexical retrieval [13, 26,27,28,29,30,31], or both integration and retrieval on more recent “hybrid” accounts [32,33,34]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call