Retrieval Analysis of Polyethylene Components in Rotating Hinge Knee Arthroplasty Implants

Abstract

BackgroundThis study examined a cohort of retrieved rotating hinge (RH) total knee arthroplasty implants of four different designs with emphasis on the surface damage observed on the polyethylene components. Our purpose was to determine if differences in polyethylene damage existed among the designs, and if those differences could be explained by differences in design characteristics. Materials and MethodsSeventy-two RH implants from four manufacturers (DePuy LPS/SROM, Zimmer NexGen, Stryker Howmedica MRH, and Biomet Finn-OSS) removed at the time of revision performed between 2002 and 2017 were identified in our institutional retrieval registry. Damage to the surfaces of the polyethylene was assessed using a subjective grading system and evaluated in multiple zones. Design characteristics that were evaluated included the following: location of the dwell point on the polyethylene component, posterior position of the axle, and amount of hyperextension and rotation allowed by the implant. ResultsThere were no differences in total damage scores between the four implant groups (P = .45). The Stryker Howmedica MRH group showed the least backside wear of all implants but significantly more articular-sided wear compared with two of the other three groups. All implants except NexGen showed increased total damage scores in implants revised for mechanical (vs nonmechanical) reasons and in implants with a longer duration of implantation. ConclusionNo single implant design emerged as superior in terms of minimizing polyethylene wear damage. Polyethylene damage existed in various locations but was not different in severity across designs, suggesting that there is no clear superior RH design that minimizes overall articular surface wear compared with other designs.