Abstract
Historians of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries provide us with a mixed picture of the role that business elites have played in the development and rupture of democracy. Their heroic moments are often followed by conservative retreats — and they have used democratic rhetoric to cloak a fear of the masses and popular participation.1 Barrington Moore’s analysis of the American Civil War (1966, 11–155) depicts Northern industrialists and Western farmers in political coalition that had democratizing effects, namely, the termination of slavery. But by the end of the nineteenth century, as Walter Dean Burnham (1965) and Samuel Hays (1980) argue, business elites in the United States were partners in a ‘reform’ movement which restricted lower class political participation. In Europe, business behaviour also varied. The Liberal party in Britain forged a coalition in the nineteenth century around free trade and gradual democratization that included industrialists and segments of the working class (Gourevitch, 1986, 76–83). But later, as illustrated in the debates between David Abraham (1981) and Henry Turner (1985), business played a murky role in the development of the fascist coalition in Germany.KeywordsPrivate SectorPresidential ElectionBusiness GroupBusiness OrganizationMilitary RegimeThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.