Abstract

Overcoming tumor-mediated immunosuppression and enhancing cytotoxic T-cell activity within the tumor microenvironment are two central goals of immuno-oncology (IO) drug discovery initiatives. However, exploratory assays involving immune components are often plagued by low-throughput and poor clinical relevance. Here we present an innovative ultra-high-content assay platform for interrogating T-cell-mediated killing of 3D multicellular tumor spheroids. Employing this assay platform in a chemical genomics screen of 1800 annotated compounds enabled identification of small molecule perturbagens capable of enhancing cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell activity in an antigen-dependent manner. Specifically, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and bromodomain (BRD) protein inhibitors were shown to significantly augment anti-tumor T-cell function by increasing cytolytic granule and type II interferon secretion in T-cells in addition to upregulating major histocompatibility complex (MHC) expression and antigen presentation in tumor cells. The described biotechnology screening platform yields multi-parametric, clinically-relevant data and can be employed kinetically for the discovery of first-in-class IO therapeutic agents. Jeremy To et al. develop an ultra-high-content assay platform used to interrogate T-cell-mediated killing of 3D multicellular tumor spheroids. They screen 1,800 annotated compounds to identify small molecules that enhance cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell activity in an antigen-dependent manner, demonstrating the utility of this assay platform.

Highlights

  • The authors are retracting this Article as inconsistencies were found between the work that was done and how the work and materials were described in the paper

  • These inconsistencies impact the accuracy of at least one figure and may put the conclusions of the Article into question. These data integrity issues undermine our full confidence in the integrity of the study and the authors wish to retract the Article

  • All the authors agree with the retraction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The authors are retracting this Article as inconsistencies were found between the work that was done and how the work and materials were described in the paper.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call