Abstract
ObjectThis research aims to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the mobile Agnew Relationship Measure (mARM-C). Methods574 college students who had recently used meditation applications were included. 102 of them were chosen for retesting two weeks later. Standards for evaluation included the Digital Working Alliance Inventory (DWAI), Trust of Counseling Scale (TCS), and Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8). The formal questionnaire was created after further modifications based on item analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). ResultsConfirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed that the five-component model fit the data well. The mARM-C has intense item discrimination, and each item is substantially and positively linked with the total score of each dimension and the total score of the measure. The mARM-C had fair to excellent internal consistency, split-half, and test–retest reliability. The convergent and criterion-related validity was acceptable. ConclusionIn conclusion, the results of this study indicate that the Chinese version of the mARM-C has good validity and reliability. It is an effective self-report measure of the DTA.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
