Abstract
In response to the opioid epidemic in the United States, the federal and state governments have initiated various public health responses to mitigate the problem. Among others, Drug-Induced Homicide Laws (DIHL) have been introduced to disrupt opioid supply by imposing unconventionally punitive sanctions against sales and distribution. The purpose of this study was to examine whether DIHL had an impact on opioid-related deaths, while controlling for other laws and socioeconomic indices. A dynamic panel model was used with cases from 92 counties across 10 states and the District of Columbia between 2013 and 2018. The findings suggest that DIHL implementation has curtailed the rate of opioid mortality. Supply-interruption approaches may have merits and should be further evaluated.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
