Abstract
Consumer behavior researchers often used two competing versions of Consumer Learning Theory to study how consumers response to Word-Of-Mouth (WOM) after a product harm crisis. The Original version predicts that real quality perception in consumer cognition is constant. By contrast, the revised version of this theory posits that it is never constant. Both versions of this theory have received support in studies that used traditional experimental methods. This study applied functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), the advanced brain imaging technique to examine (1) the neural substrates of theories of consumer behavior (i.e., the original compared with the revised versions of the Consumer Learning Theory) and (2) whether gender influences brain activation associated with WOM communication after a product harm crisis. The fMRI results showed clear biological evidence of the differentiation and localization of brain response to consumer in different WOM communication after a product harm crisis. In addition, we concluded that male tend to support the Original Consumer Learning Theory; female participants, however, showed differentiable brain activation across three factors, suggesting appear to be more sensitive to the Revised Consumer Learning Theory. Therefore, gender determines whether the original or revised version of the Consumer Learning Theory works in consumers’ decision-making.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.