Abstract

A complete assessment of the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan for hypertension is not available yet. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) by incorporating only RCTs including patients aged > 55 years in which the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan were compared with those of a reference drug (comparator). The mean reductions in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in the sitting position (msSBP and msDBP, respectively)were assumed as primary efficacy endpoints. Even mean reduction in ambulatory systolic blood pressure (maSBP) and ambulatory diastolic blood pressure(maDBP), were explored. Adverse events (AEs) were taken as safety outcomes. Five RCTs were included for a total of 1513 patients for analysis. In all studies, the comparator drug was an ARB (valsartan in two cases and olmesartan in the remaining three cases). Compared with ARBs, after 12 weeks there was a significant reduction in msSBP (weight mean difference [WMD] = - 5.41 mmHg, 95% CI - 7.0 to - 3.8; P < 0.01), msDBP (WMD = - 1.22 mmHg, 95% CI : - 2.15 to - 0.3; P < 0.01), maSBP (WMD = - 4.58 mmHg, 95% CI: - 5.62 to - 3.54; P < 0.01) and maDBP (WMD = - 2.17mm Hg, 95% Cl: - 2.78 to - 1.56; P < 0.01). Comparison with ARBs consistently showed superiority of the antihypertensive effect of sacubitril/valsartan. Therefore, based on the preliminary evidence derived from these small trials, sacubitril/valsartan could be proposed as an elective drug for hypertension in patients aged over 55.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call