Abstract

BackgroundRegarding the most important ecological challenges, scientists are increasingly debating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem function. Despite this, several experimental and theoretical researches have shown inconsistencies in biodiversity and ecosystem function relationships, supporting either the niche complementarity or selection effect hypothesis. The relationship between species diversity, functional diversity, and aboveground biomass carbon was investigated in this study employing standing aboveground carbon (AGC) stock as a proxy measure for ecosystem function. We hypothesized that (i) effects of diversity on AGC can be transmitted through functional diversity and functional dominance; (ii) effects of diversity on AGC would be greater for functional dominance than functional diversity; and (iii) effects of functional diversity and functional dominance on carbon stock varied with metrics and functional traits. Community-weighted means (CWM) of functional traits (wood density, specific leaf area, and maximum plant height) were calculated to assess functional dominance (selection effects). As for functional diversity (complementarity effects), multi-trait functional diversity (selection effects) indices were computed. We tested the first hypothesis using structural equation modeling. For the second hypothesis, the effects of environmental variables such as slope, aspect, and elevation were tested first, and separate linear mixed-effects models were fitted afterward for functional diversity, functional dominance, and the two together.ResultsResults revealed that slope had a significant effect on aboveground carbon storage. Functional diversity and functional dominance were significant predictors of the aboveground carbon storage (22.4%) in the dry evergreen Afromontane forest. The effects of species richness on aboveground carbon storage were mediated by functional diversity and functional dominance of species. This shows that both the selection effects and the niche complementarity are important for aboveground carbon storage prediction. However, the functional diversity effects (niche complementarity) were greater than functional dominance effects (selection effects).ConclusionsLinking diversity and biodiversity components to aboveground carbon provides better insights into the mechanisms that explain variation in aboveground carbon storage in natural forests, which may help improve the prediction of ecosystem functions.

Highlights

  • Regarding the most important ecological challenges, scientists are increasingly debating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem function

  • Linking diversity and biodiversity components to aboveground carbon provides better insights into the mechanisms that explain variation in aboveground carbon storage in natural forests, which may help improve the prediction of ecosystem functions

  • Diversity effects on aboveground carbon (AGC) mediated through functional diversity and functional dominance The results of structural equation models fitted to test the mediated effects of diversity on AGC, through functional diversity and functional dominance summarized in Table 1 and Fig. 3a

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Regarding the most important ecological challenges, scientists are increasingly debating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem function. Several experimental and theoretical researches have shown inconsistencies in biodiversity and ecosystem function relationships, supporting either the niche complementarity or selection effect hypothesis. The relationship between plant diversity and ecosystem functioning is one of the main ecological issues (Ruiz-Jaen and Potvin 2011; Cavanaugh et al 2014), and some aspects of climate-related effects have been well tested (Durán et al 2015; Poorter et al 2015; Wu et al 2015). Niche complementarity and selection effect hypotheses are the most common proposed ecological hypothesis used to explain the role of species diversity in ecosystem dynamics, process, and ecosystem functioning (Cavanaugh et al 2014; Poorter et al 2015; Mensah et al 2016). May result from dominant species with strong resource responses and/or strong ecosystem effects that refer to selection effects (Reich et al 2001)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call