Retirada difícil de filtro de vena cava inferior (FVCI). Consideraciones técnicas y variables asociadas

Abstract

ObjectiveTo analyze the efficacy of the procedure for withdrawing an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter and the clinical and radiological factors associated with difficult withdrawal. Material and methodsThis retrospective observational study included patients who underwent IVC filter withdrawal at a single center between May 2015 and May 2021. We recorded demographic, clinical, procedural, and radiological variables: type of IVC filter, angle with the IVC> 15°, hook against the wall, and legs embedded in the IVC wall> 3mm. The efficacy variables were fluoroscopy time, success of IVC filter withdrawal, and number of attempts to withdraw the filter. The safety variables were complications, surgical removal, and mortality. The main variable was difficult withdrawal, defined as more than 5minutes fluoroscopy or more than 1 attempt at withdrawal. ResultsA total of 109 patients were included; withdrawal was considered difficult in 54 (49.5%). Three radiological variables were more common in the difficult withdrawal group: hook against the wall (33.3% vs. 9.1%; p=0.027), embedded legs (20.4% vs. 3.6%; p=0.008), and>45 days since IVC filter placement (51.9% vs. 25.5%; p=0.006). These variables remained significant in the subgroup of patients with OptEase IVC filters; however, in the group of patients with Celect IVC filters, only the inclination of the IVC filter>15° was significantly associated with difficult withdrawal (25% vs 0%; p=0.029). ConclusionDifficult withdrawal was associated with time from IVC placement, embedded legs, and contact between the hook and the wall. The analysis of the subgroups of patients with different types of IVC filters found that these variables remained significant in those with OptEase filters; however, in those with cone-shaped devices (Celect), the inclination of the IVC filter>15° was significantly associated with difficult withdrawal.