Abstract
This article calls into question the efficacy of systemic accounts of weak state foreign policy behavior through a case study of Mongolia’s foreign policy behavior toward China. In particular, it challenges the contention within international relations and foreign policy analysis literature that weak states’ foreign policy is structurally determined. Employing James Rosenau’s five-part typology of foreign policy, the article demonstrates how Mongolia’s – a prototypical weak state – foreign policy toward China is driven by domestic factors. It also considers the case study’s implications for both the study of weak states and Northeast Asian regional dynamics.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.