Abstract

Lefebvre’s “right to the city” concept is often used to describe how individuals are challenging late capitalism and neoliberal development by appropriating urban space for collective use. While some argue that DIY urbanism can be framed as a right to the city, others dismiss its political potential. However, dominant interpretations of right to the city do not engage with Lefebvre’s interest in the body and affect, themes that resonate with both Gibson-Graham’s politics of becoming as well as DIY urbanism. By identifying these linkages, this essay constructs an alternative, vital reading of Lefebvre’s right to the city in order to explore the radical potential of DIY urbanism. It grounds this theoretical framework in an ethnographic case study of DIY projects enacted between 2012 and 2016 in Fort Worth, Texas. The essay then discusses the importance of highlighting the micropolitics of everyday urban life in order to identify and nurture their postcapitalist possibilities.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call