Abstract
This article questions received wisdom that the benefits of microfinance start with poverty reduction and are subsequently followed by social emancipation. Taking the case of Uganda and by using a consensual people-centred relevance test to assess the impact of microfinance on poverty alleviation, microfinance is shown not to improve the well-being of microfinance clients much, with only marginal well-being gains achieved by clients. However, a subsequent (gender) power relations analysis reveals that in spite of these marginal well-being gains, women clients achieved more emancipation. The article therefore calls for a rethinking of the microfinance outreach campaign in Africa, and of the controversy between the adoption of a business or welfarist approach to microfinance, suggesting that social emancipation should be pursued in its own right rather than waiting for poverty reduction to occur first. Cet article remet en question l’idée préconçue selon laquelle les bénéfices de la micro-finance consistent tout d’abord en une réduction de la pauvreté, suite à laquelle s’opère une émancipation sociale. En se basant sur le cas de l’Ouganda, et en utilisant un test de pertinence consensuel qui se focalise sur les individus afin d’évaluer l’impact de la micro-finance sur l’atténuation de la pauvreté, cet article montre que les projets de micro-finance n’améliorent pas énormément le bien-être des clients, leurs gains de bien-être étant marginaux. Cependant, une analyse plus récente des rapports de genre révèle que malgré la faiblesse des gains de bien-être, les femmes clientes de micro-finance parviennent à s’émanciper davantage que les femmes non-clientes. Cet article propose donc de réexaminer la campagne d’information sur le micro-crédit en Afrique ainsi que la controverse entre l’adoption d’une approche welfariste ou commerciale à la micro-finance, suggérant que l’émancipation sociale devrait être un objectif à part entière et non pas dépendant d’une réduction préalable de la pauvreté.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.