Abstract
The most frequently encountered arguments for the 'exilic period' date of the book of Kings depend upon premises that the book was intended to be up-to-date, and that the end of the Exile would have been a necessary episode in a monarchic story composed in the Persian or subsequent periods. The premises are unjustified and Kings could be reasonably dated to these later ages. Furthermore, scholarly constructs of a normative 'Exilic Period' are unsuitable, as diverse conceptualizations of the monarchic and post-monarchic past are to be expected to have been commonplace. For related reasons, literary features often taken as suggestive of a 'pre-exilic' edition can be interpreted differently. This paper proposes that the story Kings tells represents a symbolic history of a culturally, if not politically, autonomous vision of 'Israel', which included the communities of the Diaspora/Exile.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.