Abstract
I challenge the following positions in this article. First, I challenge what I take to be the standard philosophical view of revolution, which is (i) that revolution is justifiable only in obvious circumstances not worth theorizing about; and (ii) that a legal right to revolution is, in some sense, incoherent. Second, I challenge what I take to be the dominant philosophical understanding of sovereignty, which is (i) that there cannot be two sovereigns simultaneously governing a single territory; and (ii) that sovereignty is paradigmatically realized in centralized and hierarchical authority structures governing well-defined geographical territories.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
