Abstract

Share buybacks have been widely used around the world for a long time now. This was once seen as a form of market abuse in the US. A recent Singapore decision suggested that buybacks to counter a short-selling attack may constitute market manipulation although the Court of Appeal affirmed the decision on the basis that the statutory requirements for a buyback were not met. But those requirements have been liberalized over the past 20 to 30 years although a line should be drawn in the sand with the need for a solvency statement. Not being fully proprietary, repurchased shares should not be kept on the balance sheet. The proper purpose rule, which applies to changes of capital should also apply to share repurchases to only allow buybacks when the company has no need for financing taking into account all possible exigencies. The repurchase price should also be the lowest possible as is the case for normal buyers.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.