Abstract

IntroductionHead computed tomography (CT) interpretation is a vital skill for emergency physicians. Existing literature shows poor concordance between emergency physicians and radiologists in head CT interpretation. Prior studies have used passive learning methods to address this knowledge gap. We created an active learning curriculum for teaching head CT interpretation to emergency medicine (EM) residents and compared its effectiveness to a passive learning strategy.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, randomized controlled study of EM residents at a single institution. Three educational sessions were delivered over a three-month period via video conference. The active learning cohort (ALC) scrolled through head CT teaching cases we designed on Pascbin, a web-based radiology picture archiving and communication system. The passive learning cohort (PLC) watched instructional videos that scrolled through the same cases. Both cohorts were given equal time to review the cases and ask an instructor questions. Residents took pre-intervention and post-intervention tests on head CT interpretation. We analyzed scores using paired and unpaired t-tests.ResultsForty-two residents took the pre-intervention test. Mean pre- and post-test scores for the ALC were 43.8% and 59.0% (P <0.001), and for the PLC were 41.7% and 45.3% (P = 0.29). The difference in ALC and PLC post-test scores was statistically significant (P = 0.009) with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.34).ConclusionOur active learning head CT curriculum using Pacsbin showed superior learning outcomes when compared to a passive learning strategy and required no additional time or resources. This intervention offers a more effective and learner-centric method for implementing radiology curricula in EM residency programs.

Highlights

  • Head computed tomography (CT) interpretation is a vital skill for emergency physicians

  • Our active learning head CT curriculum using Pacsbin showed superior learning outcomes when compared to a passive learning strategy and required no additional time or resources

  • Despite a body of evidence supporting the benefits of active learning,[15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22] time and resource barriers exist to implementing these methods into residency didactic curricula.[18,19,20,21,22,23,24]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Head computed tomography (CT) interpretation is a vital skill for emergency physicians. Head CT interpretation concordance between EPs and radiologists has been shown to be poor across a variety of practice settings.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7] Prior studies addressed this knowledge gap using onetime didactic lectures or instructional videos.[8,9,10,11,12] demonstrating CT findings on single images poorly represents the cognitive work of identifying these findings in clinical practice.[13] Even if a lecturer “scrolls” through a CT, learners are unable to actively engage with the images. Despite a body of evidence supporting the benefits of active learning,[15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22] time and resource barriers exist to implementing these methods into residency didactic curricula.[18,19,20,21,22,23,24]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call