Abstract

Neuroprotection after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important goal pursued strenuously in the last 30 years. The acute cerebral injury triggers a cascade of biochemical events that may worsen the integrity, function, and connectivity of the brain cells and decrease the chance of functional recovery. A number of molecules acting against this deleterious cascade have been tested in the experimental setting, often with preliminary encouraging results. Unfortunately, clinical trials using those candidate neuroprotectants molecules have consistently produced disappointing results, highlighting the necessity of improving the research standards. Despite repeated failures in pharmacological neuroprotection, TBI treatment in neurointensive care units has achieved outcome improvement. It is likely that intensive treatment has contributed to this progress offering a different kind of neuroprotection, based on a careful prevention and limitations of intracranial and systemic threats. The natural course of acute brain damage, in fact, is often complicated by additional adverse events, like the development of intracranial hypertension, brain hypoxia, or hypoperfusion. All these events may lead to additional brain damage and worsen outcome. An approach designed for early identification and prompt correction of insults may, therefore, limit brain damage and improve results.

Highlights

  • Progress in neurosurgery, neuroradiology, and critical care medicine in the last 50 years [1] contributed to the drops of 9% per decade in traumatic brain injury (TBI) mortality among hospitalized patients between 1970 and 1990, and it has been stable since [2]

  • TBI remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity: approximately 57,000 deaths related to TBI occur in the European Union every year [3]

  • The increasing proportion of survivors includes many with neurological disabilities and poor quality of life [4]; it was estimated that 7.7 million patients live with TBI-related disabilities in Europe [5]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Neuroradiology, and critical care medicine in the last 50 years [1] contributed to the drops of 9% per decade in traumatic brain injury (TBI) mortality among hospitalized patients between 1970 and 1990, and it has been stable since [2]. The increasing proportion of survivors includes many with neurological disabilities and poor quality of life [4]; it was estimated that 7.7 million patients live with TBI-related disabilities in Europe [5] For all these reasons, neuroprotective strategies could provide immense benefits. While the primary injury at the moment of the impact (including hemorrhage, laceration, contusion, and primary axotomy) is not amenable to medical treatment, the complex cascade of molecular and cellular events (secondary injury) that follows the original damage can aggravate the initial harm This cascade reduces the chances of functional recovery but could, at least theoretically, be counteracted [6, 7]. We describe therapeutic interventions based on multimodal brain monitoring that could reduce the extent of additional insults to the injured brain

NEUROPROTECTION IN PRECLINICAL RESEARCH AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
NEUROPROTECTION AT THE BEDSIDE
Brain Electrical Disturbances during the ICU Course after TBI
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call