Rethinking environmental sustainability in rainfed cropping systems

Abstract

Activity data from a 30-year on-farm experiment with six soil-management treatments were used to develop inventory data for environmental partial life-cycle assessment (LCA). The purpose was to compare the treatments based on environmental outcomes and evaluate conservation agriculture (CA) in Australia's dryland cropping zone. Multiple trade-offs were revealed that highlight the need for a nuanced approach to sustainable intensification and show that rules-based CA is not sufficient to guarantee low greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, nor low overall environmental impact. Nutrient mining in dryland cropping even under CA can lead to losses in soil carbon that can double GHG intensity. In these systems, additional nutrient inputs can reduce the loss of soil carbon as well as net GHG emissions, demonstrating the critical need to include the effects of soil carbon change in LCA to prevent perverse outcomes.The treatment involving strategic tillage and nutrient balancing, along with stubble retention, had the lowest GHG intensity, but there was a trade-off with the higher embedded impacts across several other environmental categories. Higher fertiliser input could lead to toxicity impacts, due to heavy-metal content, that contribute significantly to the Human health endpoint. However, limitations in modelling such local, site-specific impacts were considerable and more research is needed to address this.In general, trade-offs were found to exist between impacts from on-farm activities versus upstream manufacture of inputs; between GHG emissions and land use (yield) versus other environmental categories; and between different on-farm GHG emission sources. Despite these trade-offs, the treatments all had similar overall scores in the Human health and Ecosystems damage categories. There was no single treatment with low, or high, impact scores across all environmental indicators, indicating that trade-offs need to be carefully considered when making farm-management decisions in the context of net-zero or carbon-neutral farming.