Abstract

Following 50 years of apartheid, South Africa introduced visionary health policy committing to the right to health as part of a primary health care (PHC) approach. Implementation is seriously challenged, however, in an often-dysfunctional health system with scarce resources and a complex burden of avoidable mortality persists. Our aim was to develop a process generating evidence of practical relevance on implementation processes among people excluded from access to health systems. Informed by health policy and systems research, we developed a collaborative learning platform in which we worked as co-researchers with health authorities in a rural province. This article reports on the process and insights brought by health systems stakeholders. Evidence gaps on under-five mortality were identified with a provincial Directorate after which we collected quantitative and qualitative data. We applied verbal autopsy to quantify levels, causes and circumstances of deaths and participatory action research to gain community perspectives on the problem and priorities for action. We then re-convened health systems stakeholders to analyse and interpret these data through which several systems issues were identified as contributory to under-five deaths: staff availability and performance; service organization and infrastructure; multiple parallel initiatives; and capacity to address social determinants. Recommendations were developed ranging from immediate low- and no-cost re-organization of services to those where responses from higher levels of the system or outside were required. The process was viewed as acceptable and relevant for an overburdened system operating ‘in the dark’ in the absence of local data. Institutional infrastructure for evidence-based decision-making does not exist in many health systems. We developed a process connecting research evidence on rural health priorities with the means for action and enabled new partnerships between communities, authorities and researchers. Further development is planned to understand potential in deliberative processes for rural PHC.

Highlights

  • Fifty years of apartheid in South Africa resulted in entrenched racial inequalities (Smith, 2005)

  • Informed by health policy and systems research, we developed a collaborative learning platform in which we worked as co-researchers with health authorities in a rural province

  • Despite the ‘unhurried, strategic vision’ (Mehl et al, 2018) of the South African Department of Health (DoH), implementation is beset with challenges in a public health system characterized by decades of chronic underinvestment, human resource crises, corruption, poor stewardship and deteriorating infrastructure (Coovadia et al, 2009; McIntyre, 2012) and disproportionate burdens of avoidable mortality persist with widening inequalities documented recently (Bradshaw et al, 2003; Harris et al, 2011; Gomez-Oliveet al., 2014; Mayosi and Benatar, 2014; World Bank, 2018a)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fifty years of apartheid in South Africa resulted in entrenched racial inequalities (Smith, 2005). Despite the ‘unhurried, strategic vision’ (Mehl et al, 2018) of the South African Department of Health (DoH), implementation is beset with challenges in a public health system characterized by decades of chronic underinvestment, human resource crises, corruption, poor stewardship and deteriorating infrastructure (Coovadia et al, 2009; McIntyre, 2012) and disproportionate burdens of avoidable mortality persist with widening inequalities documented recently (Bradshaw et al, 2003; Harris et al, 2011; Gomez-Oliveet al., 2014; Mayosi and Benatar, 2014; World Bank, 2018a) In this scenario, there is an urgent need for evidence on the processes through which policy is implemented for people who are socially excluded from access to health systems. Despite considerable interest in evidence-based policy over the past three decades, there is comparatively less attention to the processes through which evidence is produced and used in policy-making (Parkhurst, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.