Abstract

The introduction of compulsory citizenship education in England’s schools, following the Crick Report’s recommendations of 1998, has proved controversial and, according to a growing body of evidence, largely unsuccessful in its implementation. If citizenship education is to play an effective role in democratic renewal this article argues that its form and content needs to be reconsidered beyond the limits of Crick. Contemporary citizenship theory, and especially notions of intimate and multiple citizenship, provide useful conceptual tools for this critical revaluation. Having first set the Crick Report in political context, this article develops a critique of the Report’s sociological naivety and its contradictory recommendations. The analyses of intimate and multiple citizenship that follow further point to the limits of Crick and suggest the need for a broader and bolder approach to citizenship education. The final section draws out some of the implications of this argument for the citizenship curriculum in schools.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.