Rethinking Air Traffic Flow Management Roles and Responsibilities

Abstract

This paper explores how applying a basic management science principle to air traffic management operations can lead to revised roles and responsibilities that allow operations to be handled by the most appropriate participants. Previous research that applied the principle to local departure and arrival management is reviewed; the application is then expanded to regional and national air traffic management. The paper examines the operational and engineering implications of the resulting concept, contrasted with current operations and tools, and identifies where additional research or development is needed. Examples are provided that illustrate the resulting activities at the various air traffic management facilities across a broad range of look-ahead timeframes. I. Introduction HE High-Density Area Departure and Arrival Management (HDDAM) concept was developed in the context of arrival and departure air traffic management in high-density airspace such as Metroplex areas. The management science principles underlying HDDAM appear to be applicable to National Airspace System (NAS) operations at any level, including all phases of planning and flight. This paper explores some operational and engineering implications of such an application to local, regional, and NAS-wide air traffic operations. As described elsewhere, 1-3 HDDAM redefines the decision making processes within the Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC), the Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON), and multiple Air Traffic Control Towers (ATCTs) for high-density area departure/arrival traffic management. The decision making authority proposed for each facility reflects the information available to each decision maker and the impact of the decision on their operating environment. Specifically, each facility is responsible for defining the capacity of its air traffic management resources (such as airports, airspace, airways) and requesting resources for flights to use. As shown in Fig. 1 for a single Metroplex, the TRACON has a central role in these interactions, serving as a “broker” between the facilities with the resources and the facilities with requests for use of those resources that are not within their scope of control, while also accounting for the TRACON’s ability to deliver the flights to the resources in question. ATCTs are responsible for requesting resources for departing flights and the ARTCC for requesting resources for arriving flights, as they each possess the best information regarding the status of these flights. Because of the uncertainties present in predicting individual flight departure readiness and inbound air traffic arrival times, the TRACON does not assign specific departure and arrival slots to individual flights. Instead, the TRACON allocates slots to the airports (for departures) and ARTCC (for arrivals) so they can make flight-specific assignments as deemed best for their individual operating environments. This effectively decouples the decisions of the individual ATCTs and the ARTCC, giving each facility increased flexibility to handle situations dynamically as they develop. Air traffic management operations are most effective when the decision makers work as a team. The underlying principle of HDDAM is that this can be accomplished best when all facilities’ roles and responsibilities are based on the management science principle that allows the appropriate level of autonomy at each facility. The principle states that decisions should be assigned to those who are already performing other tasks with the relevant data—those who know the most about the factors affecting the decision—and will be most directly affected by the consequences of 1 Lead Multi-Discipline System Engineer, TFM System Engineering and Evolution, 7515 Colshire Drive, Mailstop