Abstract
Abstract Double-tagging experiments provide the necessary information to evaluate the relative merits of different tag types, as well as information for the correction of population dynamics parameters such as population estimates and survival. We initiated a double-tagging experiment in 1993 to evaluate the relative merits of passive integrated transponder (PIT) and anchor tags for tagging Arctic grayling Thymallus arcticus. Tag retention was best represented by power curves for both tag types. Instantaneous losses were higher for PIT tags (7% and 14%, respectively, for anchor and PIT tags). Despite this initial disparity, tag retention was very similar between the two tag types after 3 years (85% and 83%, respectively, for anchor and PIT tags). Loss of anchor tags accelerated over time while loss of PIT tags remained reasonably constant. We estimated that half the anchor tags would be lost within 6 years and that all would be lost within 8 years. In contrast, it would take 11 years for half the PIT tags...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.