Abstract

The retention of patients in care is a key pillar of the continuum of HIV care. It has been suggested that the implementation of a "treat-all" strategy may favor attrition (death or lost to follow-up, as opposed to retention), specifically in the subgroup of asymptomatic people living with HIV (PLWH) with high CD4 counts. Attrition in HIV care could mitigate the success of universal antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-limited settings. We performed a retrospective study of PLWH at least 15 years old initiating ART in 85 HIV care centers in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), between 2010 and 2019, with the objective of measuring attrition and to define factors associated with it. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics recorded at ART initiation included sex, age, weight, height, WHO HIV stage, pregnancy, baseline CD4 cell count, start date of ART, and baseline and last ART regimen. Attrition was defined as death or loss to follow-up (LTFU). LTFU was defined as "not presenting to an HIV care center for at least 180 days after the date of a last missed visit, without a notification of death or transfer". Kaplan-Meier curves were used to present attrition data, and mixed effects Cox regression models determined factors associated with attrition. The results compared were before and after the implementation of the "treat-all" strategy. A total of 15,762 PLWH were included in the study. Overall, retention in HIV care was 83% at twelve months and 77% after two years of follow-up. The risk of attrition increased with advanced HIV disease and the size of the HIV care center. Time to ART initiation greater than seven days after diagnosis and Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis was associated with a reduced risk of attrition. The implementation of the "treat-all" strategy modified the clinical characteristics of PLWH toward higher CD4 cell counts and a greater proportion of patients at WHO stages I and II at treatment initiation. Initiation of ART after the implementation of the 'treat all" strategy was associated with higher attrition (p<0.0001) and higher LTFU (p<0.0001). Attrition has remained high in recent years. The implementation of the "treat-all" strategy was associated with higher attrition and LTFU in our study. Interventions to improve early and ongoing commitment to care are needed, with specific attention to high-risk groups to improve ART coverage and limit HIV transmission.

Highlights

  • The proportion of people living with HIV (PLWH) on antiretroviral treatment (ART) significantly increased after the adoption of the “triple 90” goals and the “treat-all” (TA) strategy [1], with 68.4% of PLWH on ART in June 2020 [2]

  • We examined the entire cohort, and we divided the cohort into two cohorts of PLWH depending on the timing of ART initiation:

  • The proportion of PLWH starting ART rapidly was lower during P1 (49.8 vs. 94.5%, p

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The proportion of people living with HIV (PLWH) on antiretroviral treatment (ART) significantly increased after the adoption of the “triple 90” goals and the “treat-all” (TA) strategy [1], with 68.4% of PLWH on ART in June 2020 [2]. Substantial evidence supports the benefits of early initiation of ART [3–6]. Full realization of these benefits requires patient progression through the cascade of care [HIV testing, diagnosis, link to health services, ART adherence, and viral suppression] with continued commitment to care for life. ART programs must maximize retention and adherence to ART while scaling up to reap the benefits of the TA strategy [7–10]. This is a major challenge in resource-limited settings [11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call