Abstract

ObjectiveTo highlight a troubling cause of dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) failure and to alert ophthalmologists to the potential problems that can result when stenting material is not removed and becomes retained after DCR. DesignConsecutive noncomparative case series. ParticipantsTwelve patients who underwent revision DCR from February 1994 to January 1997. InterventionEndoscopic DCR, pre- and postoperative nasal endoscopy, preoperative computerized tomography (CT), and pre- and postoperative Jones testing. ResultsFourteen revision endoscopic procedures were performed on 12 patients with recurrent epiphora following DCR. Failure was due to retained stenting material in six patients, a small bony rhinostomy in three patients, excessive scar formation within the rhinostomy in two patients, and improper location of the rhinostomy in one patient. Preoperative endoscopy and CT scan each correctly identified the retained sponge or tubing in four of six patients. ConclusionsFastening a small sponge to Silastic tubing and positioning it within the DCR site in an attempt to retard DCR stenosis can be associated with a poor outcome and should be avoided. The nasal endoscope provided excellent visualization of pathology within the lacrimal sac and was a valuable tool. Retained stenting material should be considered in patients with persistent epiphora following DCR or intubation prior to any decision to commit a patient to permanent Jones tube placement.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.