Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was not marked as recommended. Background: Mind maps (MM), is a learning method assisting learners in the visualisation of relationships between theoretical concepts. Studies also showed enhancement of data retention, overall comprehension, and creativity in MM users. Thus, MM has been implemented in many medical schools to facilitate medical students' learning experiences. Nevertheless, retained mind mapping skills and its effect on the learning outcomes in long-term follow-up remain unknown. Methods: A concurrent mixed-methods design with convenient sampling method. All (48) second-year medical students joined a three-day MM workshop. One year later, we surveyed the students who still use MM and those who did not. Mind Map Assessment Rubric (MMAR) and Grade Point Average (GPA) were compared between two groups. Content analysis with data triangulation method was used to explore their preferences and MM skills. Results: We achieved a 100% response rate. 39 (81.2%) of participants were female. The mean age of participants was 20.6 years (SD = 0.5). 37 students still use MM (77.1%). With MMAR, participants in MM group scored 28.9 higher than participants in MM-free group significantly (p = 0.01). There were no differences in the median GPAs to both groups. However, there was a significant correlation between using MM in learning and the second trimester (year1) (r=0.29, p<0.05). Majority of participants in MM groups stated the advantages of using MM as a tool helping those organising data and their thought process. On the contrary, students in MM-free group declared the disadvantages of MM as a time-consuming and missing data from lectures. Conclusions: Without revision in MM, participants' skills deteriorated immensely. There was a non-statistically significant trend toward increased learning outcomes with MM group. Further studies to examine whether more frequent MM use or workshop revision can boost their learning outcomes or not is recommended.

Highlights

  • Medicine is an ever-evolving, dynamic subject that changes continuously

  • Majority of participants in Mind maps (MM) groups stated the advantages of using MM as a tool helping those organising data and their thought process

  • While MM is still used as a tool for assisting in learning globally, retained skills of MM without any revision and its efficacy on learning outcomes in the long-term period have not been well established in medical students

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Medicine is an ever-evolving, dynamic subject that changes continuously. The amount of new knowledge that we need to understand and memorise increasing immensely. In terms of facilitating the conversion of information to memory, it consists of spider diagrams, colour, pictures, key words, association line, and highlighting key branches within a boundary known as ‘chunking’ (Day and Bellezza, 1983) (Howe, 1970)(Glass and Holyoak, 1986) (Bellezza, 1983). This technique augments the visualisation of relationships and links between concepts, which aids in information acquisition, data retention, and comprehension (Spencer, Anderson and Ellis, 2013). Retained mind mapping skills and its effect on the learning outcomes in long-term followup remain unknown

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call