Abstract

Costica Dumbrava has raised an important question about whether to abandon ius sanguinis citizenship. His arguments are that ius sanguinis is historically tainted and unfit to deal with contemporary issues such as developments in reproductive technologies and changes in family practices and norms. He also claims that ius sanguinis is normatively unnecessary, as it is possible to deliver its advantages by other means. In my response I argue that – from a human rights perspective – children need their parents’ citizenship – or rather, the citizenship of their primary caretakers, be they biological parents or not. Consequently, although I concur with the argument that ius sanguinis, if taken literally, is unfit to deal with some new family arrangements, I do not endorse the viewpoint that it is time to abandon ius sanguinis. Rather, ius sanguinis should be translated into ius filiationis by entitling children to their social parents’ citizenship. In order to achieve mutual understanding about this, states should engage in international cooperation with a view to adopting common guidelines on the recognition of the legal parent-child relationship –as happens already with regard to adoption.

Highlights

  • There is no doubt that Costica Dumbrava has raised an important question about whether to abandon ius sanguinis citizenship

  • It is not time to abandon ius sanguinis, mainly because it is impossible to secure its advantages by other means

  • Ius sanguinis, if taken literally, is unfit to deal with contemporary issues such as complex family arrangements involving, among other things, assisted reproduction technologies (ART)

Read more

Summary

Eva Ersbøll

There is no doubt that Costica Dumbrava has raised an important question about whether to abandon ius sanguinis citizenship. His arguments are that ius sanguinis is historically tainted and unfit to deal with contemporary issues such as developments in reproductive technologies and changes in family practices and norms; he claims that ius sanguinis is normatively unnecessary, as it is possible to deliver its advantages by other means. A solution to many of the problems related to reproductive technologies has been advanced by the Council of Europe, the Committee of Ministers, in Recommendation CM/Rec(2009)[13] on the nationality of children: Member states should apply to children their provisions on acquisition of nationality by right of blood if, as a result of a birth conceived through medically assisted reproductive techniques, a child-parent family relationship is established or recognised by law.[1].

History is not an argument
Unity of the family
Ius filiationis benefits
Human rights protection at this stage
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call