Abstract

Objective: determine the frequency of initial rhythms in in-hospital resuscitation and examine its relationship to survival. Assess changes in outcome over time. Methods: retrospective cohort (registry) including all admissions to the Medical Center of Central Georgia in which a resuscitation was attempted between 1 January, 1987 and 31 December, 1996. Results: the registry includes 3327 admissions in which 3926 resuscitations were attempted. Only the first event is reported. There were 961 hospital survivors. Survival increased from 24.2% in 1987 to 33.4% in 1996 ( χ 2=39.0, df=1, P<0.0001). Survival was affected strongly by initial rhythm ( χ 2=420.0, df=1, P<0.0001) and decreased from 63.2% for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) to 55.3% for ventricular tachycardia (VT), 51.0% for perfusing rhythms (PER), 34.8% for ventricular fibrillation (VF), 14.3% for pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and 10.0% for asystole (ASYS). PEA was the most frequent rhythm (1180 cases) followed by perfusing (963), asystole (580), VF (459), VT (94) and SVT (38). Discussion: the powerful effect of initial rhythm on survival has been reported in pre-hospital and in-hospital resuscitation. VF is considered the dominant rhythm and generally accounts for the most survivors. We report good outcome for each; however, VF represents only 13.8% of events and 16.7% of survivors. PEA accounts for more survivors (169) than does VF (160). Our improved outcome is partially explained by changes in rhythms, but other institutional variables need to be identified to fully explain the results. Further studies are needed to see if our findings can be sustained or replicated.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.