Resurfacing of multiple adjacent defects with free multipaddle SCIAP flaps

Abstract

BackgroundThe efficient resurfacing of multiple adjacent defects (MADs) requires precise reconstructive strategy. Various approaches (e.g., several flap transferring or prelamination of the recipient site) have been reported, but recipient-site impairments, pain, long hospitalization, and low cost-benefit results fatefully considered them as compromise approaches. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of MADs reconstruction with free multipaddle superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIAP) flaps. MethodsFrom Dec 2015 to Dec 2020, we enrolled patients with upper and lower extremity defects treated with various multipaddle SCIAP flaps (2-paddle, 3-paddle, and 4-paddle). Patient demographics and outcomes of each group were collected. ResultsThirty-two, 21, and 6 patients underwent 2-paddle, 3-paddle, and 4-paddle SCIAP flaps transfers, respectively. All multipaddle SCIAP flaps survived without vascular problems, and the donor sites were closed directly. Except for 3 cases of 2-paddle SCIAP flaps drained by superficial circumflex iliac vein venous return, most cases (n = 56) were drained by venae comitans. Minor complications, including partial flap necrosis (4 cases) and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsies (11 cases), were treated conservatively. All patients were satisfied with the reconstructive outcome. ConclusionMultiple adjacent defects reconstruction is still a Gordian knot and lacks a golden standard. The free multipaddle SCIAP flap was demonstrated as a promising alternative, not only enriching its versatility but also initially highlighting the “replace need with need” reconstructive demand.