Abstract

The heavy jet mass distribution in e+e- collisions is computed to next-to-next-to-next-to leading logarithmic (NNNLL) and next-to-next-to leading fixed order accuracy (NNLO). The singular terms predicted from the resummed distribution are confirmed by the fixed order distributions allowing a precise extraction of the unknown soft function coefficients. A number of quantitative and qualitative comparisons of heavy jet mass and the related thrust distribution are made. From fitting to ALEPH data, a value of alpha_s is extracted, alpha_s(m_Z)=0.1220 +/- 0.0031, which is larger than, but not in conflict with, the corresponding value for thrust. A weighted average of the two produces alpha_s(m_Z) = 0.1193 +/- 0.0027, consistent with the world average. A study of the non-perturbative corrections shows that the flat direction observed for thrust between alpha_s and a simple non-perturbative shape parameter is not lifted in combining with heavy jet mass. The Monte Carlo treatment of hadronization gives qualitatively different results for thrust and heavy jet mass, and we conclude that it cannot be trusted to add power corrections to the event shape distributions at this accuracy. Whether a more sophisticated effective field theory approach to power corrections can reconcile the thrust and heavy jet mass distributions remains an open question.

Highlights

  • Event shapes in e+e− collisions provide some of the best ways to test QCD and the standard model

  • We found a mild inconsistency with the analytic results from Soft-Collinear Effective Theory (SCET) and the numerical calculations of the NLO and next-to-next-to leading fixed order accuracy (NNLO) distributions

  • We have studied the heavy jet mass distribution using Soft-Collinear Effective Theory including N3LL resummation and matching to the NNLO fixed order distribution

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Event shapes in e+e− collisions provide some of the best ways to test QCD and the standard model. We correct that concern with a N3LL calculation of an event shape from the second class, heavy jet mass. We will discuss constraints on the soft function, and perform a numerical study of the parts that are not known, similar to what was done in [11] and [22] Hadronization is another issue which having a second event shape may help understand. Concluding that the Monte Carlo hadronization model is incompatible with the high precision theoretical calculation, we explore non-perturbative corrections in SCET with a simple shape function.

Thrust and Heavy Jet Mass in SCET
Hemisphere Soft Function and Comparison to Fixed Order
Non-perturbative effects and quark mass corrections
Thrust
Conclusions
40 PSfrag replacements 60
Findings
A Soft function
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call