Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to review the roleof the pathologist in mammography screening. Patientsand Methods: The first German mammography screeningproject was undertaken in Bremen in June 2001.Women between the ages of 50 and 69 were offeredmammographic assessment. Suspicious findings werefollowed up by a stereotactic core biopsy or vacuum-assistedcore biopsy. The tissue was examined at the Departmentof Pathology in Bremen as well as at the Sectionof Breast Pathology at the University Münster. Eachcase was discussed in a multidisciplinary board. Thecore biopsies were classified according to the 5-pointscale of the internationial guidelines. Results: Biopsieswere obtained from 402 women within the first 2 yearsof the screening project. Of these, 47% were assigned togroup B5 (malignant), 44% were categorized in group B2(benign) while 1% was classified in group B1 (regularbreast tissue, unsatisfactory) and 8% were assigned tothe group B3/B4 (lesion of uncertain malignant potential /suspicious for malignancy). The discrepancies in 10% ofthe cases centered on papillary lesions, flat epithelialatypia (FEA) and atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH). Conclusion:In clearly defined lesions the agreement of thehistological findings of independent pathologists is veryhigh. In unclear lesions it should be raised. In addition,close cooperation between clinicians, radiologists andpathologists is critical.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.