Abstract

Simulation of nuclear systems requires complete data that represents the relevant nuclear physics. This requires many types of experimental measurements, theoretical physics, semi-empirical models and software systems, as well as experts to integrate and guide the process. This discipline is collectively known as nuclear data, and separate programmes within various European countries, the USA, Japan, Russia, and other OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) member countries have been operating for many decades. The NEA Working Party on International Nuclear Data Evaluation Co-operation (WPEC) exists to improve the quality and completeness of nuclear data by bringing together representatives of the major nuclear data evaluation projects of NEA member countries and selected Invitees. The Sub- and Expert Groups of the WPEC typically focus on specific technical topics, while the Collaborative International Evaluated Library Organisation Pilot Project (CIELO) was established to generate complete evaluations for a selection of the most important isotopes for criticality in nuclear technologies: 235,238U, 239Pu, 56Fe, 16O and 1H. This project stimulated numerous activities, resulting in major contributions to the Special Issue of the Nuclear Data Sheets journal and the production of a suite of new nuclear data evaluations that have been incorporated in major nuclear data libraries ENDF and JEFF. The outcomes of these evaluations include significant harmonisa-tion of discrepancies between the independent programmes, improvement in the performance for international standard nuclear criticality and neutron transmission benchmarks, complete uncertainties for nearly all parameters and the utilisation of modern data storage technologies. This work has leveraged the considerable, parallel experimental work in collecting improved experimental measurements to support nuclear data and highlighted high-priority areas for further study. A productive and durable framework for international evaluation has been established which will build upon the lessons learned. These will continue through new WPEC groups and a new IAEA evaluation network, which has been initiated in response to the success of the CIELO project. This article summaries some performance feedback on the CIELO evaluations, including recent results, and will describe ongoing and future, planned CIELO-related collaborations to further advance our understanding.

Highlights

  • Formed in 1989, the Working Party on International Nuclear Data Evaluation Cooperation (WPEC) has brought experts in nuclear data together to co-ordinate activities in experiments, theory, modelling, evaluation and validation

  • All of the world’s nuclear data programmes, including those from Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) member countries, China and the IAEA, pool their expertise to address the largest challenges in their field

  • WPEC operates by forming subgroups to study and advance the state-of-the-art through well-defined projects over a three-year period

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Formed in 1989, the Working Party on International Nuclear Data Evaluation Cooperation (WPEC) has brought experts in nuclear data together to co-ordinate activities in experiments, theory, modelling, evaluation and validation. Before CIELO, the performance of well-known libraries was already at an impressive level, but it was argued that by bringing together all of the WPEC participants, new theory and models, the most recent experimental data and sophisticated integral feedback methods, a three-year project could deliver evaluations with performance superior to the previous ENDF/B and JEFF releases. This Subgroup integrated findings from other WPEC Subgroups and spurred an intense collaboration, involving experts from over 70 institutions, that delivered as intended [1, 2]. A new Subgroup on reproducibility has been established to work hand-in-glove with INDEN and all member country projects by integrating the wealth of NEA-coordinated validation expertise, NEA tools such as NDaST and the new collaborative NEA GitLab platform

Experimental data
New evaluations
Fission in 235U and 239Pu
Evaluation of 56Fe
Evaluation of 16O
Final CIELO file suites
Results with integral benchmarks
Future
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call