Abstract

For patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) in whom endovascular treatment is not the optimal treatment strategy, microsurgical clipping remains a viable option. We examined changes in morbidity and outcome over time in patients treated surgically and in relation to surgeon volume and experience. All patients who underwent microsurgery for aSAH from 2007 to 2019 at our institution were included. We compared technical complication rates and surgical outcomes between experienced (≥50 independent cases) and inexperienced (<50 independent cases) surgeons and between high-volume (≥20 cases/year) and low-volume (<20 cases/year) surgeons. Most of the 1,003 aneurysms (970 patients, median age 56years) were in the middle cerebral (41.4%), anterior communicating (27.6%), and posterior communicating (17.5%) arteries; 46.5% were <7mm. The technical complication rate was 7%, resulting in postoperative infarct in 4.9% of patients. Nineteen patients (2%) died within 30days of admission. There were no significant changes in rates of technical complication, postoperative infarct, or mortality over the study period. There were no differences in postoperative infarction and technical complication rates between experienced and inexperienced surgeons (P= 0.28 and P= 0.05, respectively), but there were differences when comparing high-volume and low-volume surgeons (P= 0.03 and P < 0.001, respectively). The independent predictors of postoperative infarctions were aneurysm size (P= 0.001), intraoperative large-vessel injury (P < 0.001), and low surgeon volume (P= 0.03). We present real-world data on surgical morbidity and outcomes after aSAH. We demonstrated a relationship between surgeon volume and outcome for surgical treatment of aSAH, which supports the benefit of subspecialization in cerebrovascular surgery.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call