Abstract
By the beginning of the 1970s, only two large regions with natural vegetation, namely the Volga–Akhtuba floodplain and the Volga delta, had remained in the Volga River valley. The largest part of the remaining valley had been converted into a cascade of reservoirs. The conservation of meadow, marsh, and forest plant communities in the lower reaches of the Volga River located in the semi-desert and desert zones is due to regular water releases of the Volgograd hydroelectric power station downstream. These artificial water discharges into the Lower Volga valley in the spring–summer period have taken the place of natural floods. However, in the conditions of regulated water flow, the rise in the water level decreased during floods and the duration of flooding of the floodplain ecotopes shortened. The river channel deepened along a 100-km river section in the near-dam part of the Volgograd hydroelectric power station in the northern part of the floodplain. These dams hinder water flow to the Akhtuba–Volga floodplain during spring and summer floods. They surround agricultural lands with artificial irrigation systems and settlements in the floodplain. The recreational use of the Lower Volga valley has increased in the past few decades. Before the construction of the largest Volga hydroelectric complexes (the Kama, Gorky, Kuibyshev, Volgograd, and Saratov ones) in 1954–1955, five geobotanical transects were laid out in the course of the Caspian expedition of Moscow State University. Subsequently, four of the transects were surveyed in 1982 and 2008 –2013. It was established that xerophytization and ruderalization of vegetation occurred on all transects. These phenomena were not similar in different sections of the floodplain. They were most pronounced near the Volgograd Hydroelectric Power Station and in the places of narrowing of the valley. The reduction in the height and duration of floods after the regulation of the water flow, high local grazing, and recreation pressure is the main reason for xerophytization and ruderalization of vegetation. Among the invasive species, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Conyza canadensis, Bidens frondosa, and Xanthium strumarium s.l. play the most important role in changes in the vegetative cover of the Volga–Akhtuba floodplain. Thus, not all phenomena related to the dynamics of the vegetation and flora in the Volga–Akhtuba floodplain were caused by restructuring of the Volga hydrological regime after regulation of its water flow. The invasion of alien plants, increased recreation load, and changes in the economic use of the vegetation cover in the territory have played a particular role in this process.
Highlights
Они окружают сельскохозяйственные поля с инженерными системами орошения и населенные пункты в пойме
Объемы весенне-летних половодий во втором и третьем периодах были меньшими, чем в первый
Before the building of the largest Volga hydroelectric complexes (the Kama, Gorky, Kuibyshev, Volgograd and Saratov ones), in 1954–1955, the Caspian expedition of Moscow State University laid five geobotanical transects in the Volga-Akhtuba floodplain
Summary
Еще до создания наиболее крупных волжских водохранилищ (Камского, Горьковского, Куйбышевского, Волгоградского, Саратовского) в 1954 – 1955 гг. Сохранились вычерченные профили трансект, аэрофотоснимки с указанием мест расположения пробных площадок и геоботанические описания, сделанные на них. Все учетные площадки на трансектах были повторно обследованы. Позднее еще раз были проведены учеты на четырех трансектах: у г. Первые три из названных трансект были заложены в расширенных частях Волго-Ахтубы, где преобладает равнинная внутренняя пойма. Болхуны расположена в суженной части поймы, для которой характерен гривистый рельеф и высокие песчаные бугры эолового происхождения. Для анализа изменений растительности геоботанические описания по четырем трансектам мы сгруппировали в три периода: I – 1954 – 1955 гг., II – 1982 г., III – 2008 – 2013 гг. Общая длина четырех трансект с естественным растительным покровом в первый период составляла 79.9 км. Ко второму периоду в результате разрушения водой прирусловья Волги, обвалования лугов и превращения их в пашню, их длина с естественным покровом сократилась до 70.5 км, к третьему – до 65.7 км
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.