Results of nerve sutures in the wrist in children

Abstract

Wounds involving the peripheral nerves cause serious damage in the upper limb. The prognosis for recovery remains uncertain despite microsurgery. It is commonly accepted that the results are far better in children than in adults. We sought to confirm this idea on the basis of objective recovery criteria, discriminating between peripheral axonal regeneration and the child's own capacity to adapt. In other words, do nerves regenerate better in children? The clinical results of 25 nerve sutures of the wrist, in children under 15, were analysed with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The subjects were reviewed clinically and had an electromyogram. The resulting data was compared to that for adults found in the literature. Clinically, the overall function of the hand was always satisfactory. The sensory results were often excellent (S4 or S3+ in 23 cases/25). The mean value muscular testing was between M2 and M3. With respect to the EMG results, the values we recorded were rarely representative of the functional results. The motor recordings were mostly poor, demonstrating that the nerve supply was compensated by a phenomenon involving collateral innervation. The poor results of peripheral nerve surgery are only due to the quality of the restored innervation. Dellon and Mackinnon demonstrated that they were also due to the incapacity of the nerve centres to integrate a change in the profile of sensory information. It would therefore seem that not only the quantity of nerve tissue repair is insufficient, but also the quality. Children have a superior cerebral capacity to adapt than adults and probably benefit from better cortical acquisition processes and are thus capable of putting the changes in the nerve messages to better use. The analysis of the clinical and EMG results also reveals a trend demonstrated partial nerve repair in children. We think that the functional results suggest that children have a better central capacity to adapt.