Results and complications of permanent pacing in pediatric patients with congenital or acquired atrioventricular block

Abstract

Currently there is no evidence to prefer an endocardial or epicardial approach for pacing in pediatric patients. This analysis was aimed at defining the complications of pacemaker implantation in a pediatric population with atrioventricular block according to a strategy of choosing an epicardial system for patients <10 kg and an endocardial system for patients >10 kg. This is a retrospective study performed on 27 patients, with and without congenital heart disease, implanted with a permanent pacemaker because of idiopathic or acquired atrioventricular block at our Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery Unit of S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital in Bologna (Italy) between 1981 and 2010. Patients were divided into two groups: 70% of the population (group A) was implanted with an epicardial system, 30% (group B) with an endocardial system. After a mean follow-up of 14 years (17 ± 8 years for group A, 7 ± 5 years for group B), the most frequent complications were lead failure (44%) and infection (18%). Both were more common in the epicardial system group: lead failure rate 53% in group A vs 25% in group B (p=0.0001); infection rate 26% in group A vs 0% in group B (p=0.0001); rate of system revision or implantation of a new electrode 42% in group A vs 12% in group B (p=0.0001). The present study demonstrates a high complication rate in patients undergoing an epicardial pacing system implantation. However, in patients <10 kg the epicardial system allows subclavian venous access protection for endocardial system implantation after somatic growth, avoiding high-risk procedures of system revision or lead extraction and subclavian vein occlusion in the long term.