Resultados perinatales tras prueba diagnóstica invasiva en el embarazo

Abstract

IntroductionInvasive prenatal diagnostic techniques allow us to conduct genetic tests. The development of non-invasive techniques has reduced their use. The foetal loss rate following an invasive procedure is considered to be around 1%. The published data is heterogeneous however, although everything indicates that the risk has been overestimated, we need to conduct further studies. Material and methodsIn our single-centre retrospective study we analysed the procedures carried out using invasive prenatal diagnostic techniques between 2011 and 2019. A total of 832 invasive techniques were performed. Perinatal results are compared with a control group of pregnant women (n=1734). ResultsThe early foetal loss rate for the different techniques were 1.1% for amniocentesis, 1.6% for transvaginal chorionic biopsy and 5% for abdominal chorionic biopsy, with a total rate of 1.1%, without statistically significant differences between them (P=.57). We found differences in foetal outcome, in terms of variable early foetal loss, related to the attempts made (when three attempts were made, the risk increased). When comparing the perinatal outcomes after delivery of the group that underwent techniques with the control group, a higher rate of caesarean sections was found in the study group (28.9% vs 20.5%), in addition to lower mean gestational age at delivery (38.33 vs. 38.95 weeks). DiscussionWhen the invasive technique is performed at the right time and with no more than two attempts, we consider that the risk of foetal loss is not affected, and is equal to that of the general population.