Abstract
As this chapter is being written, the European Union and the United States finally resolved a bitter conflict over a product neither of them produces — bananas. The US has long objected to the EU’s ‘banana regime’, which in effect discriminates against Latin American bananas grown for US-based multinational operating firms and in favour of small-scale producers in former European colonies in Africa and the Caribbean. The United States, having secured decisions in its favour at both the GATT and the WTO, lost patience with European efforts to reform the regime throughout 1998 and, by March 1999, asked European exporters to post bonds with the US customs services. In the event, a WTO arbitration panel allowed the US to levy punitive duties. That bananas should drive the transatlantic partners closer to trade war than they have been in recent years, will strike many as absurd. It shouldn’t, really, as observers of American — European trade relations can reel off a catalogue of disputes — of varying severity — in the area of agriculture: the chicken war and pasta dispute for example. The European Union’s continued ban on US exports of hormone-treated beef has also brought the parties to the WTO.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.