Abstract
Restrictive Versus Liberal Fluid Bolus Therapy in Pediatric Septic Shock: Should It Be Debated
Highlights
To date, sepsis has contributed significantly to the child mortality rate, which is around 8.9% in developed countries to 14.2% in developing countries [1,2,3]
Fluid bolus is the main therapy for pediatric septic shock
It needs to be reevaluated whether the effectiveness of fluid bolus therapy (FBT) in daily practice, certainly has a causal relationship with patient survival, or it was just a representation of lower severity illness in the survivor group
Summary
*1Corresponding author: Saptadi Yuliarto, Consultant of Emergency and Intensive Care, Division of Pediatric Emergency and Intensive Care, Department of Pediatrics, Medical Faculty, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia Submission: August 13, 2019 Published: August 19, 2019. How to cite this article: Yuliarto S. Restrictive Versus Liberal Fluid Bolus Therapy in Pediatric Septic Shock: Should It Be Debated
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
