Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive overview of EU restrictive measures applicable within the EU, the competences and legal evolution which lead to the implementation of Common Foreign and Security Policy restrictive measures (CFSP sanctions), and considers procedural issues, developments in the latest case law, and the challenges of securing compliance with EU sanctions, which reach beyond the territory of the EU.

Highlights

  • This article provides a comprehensive overview of EU restrictive measures applicable within the EU, the competences and legal evolution which lead to the implementation of Common Foreign and Security Policy restrictive measures (CFSP sanctions), and considers procedural issues, developments in the latest case law, and the challenges of securing compliance with EU sanctions, which reach beyond the territory of the EU

  • While European foreign ministers approved the new European Global Human rights restrictive measures regime in early December 2020, targeting perpetrators of human rights violations, regardless of location and nationality as part of the European common foreign and security policy (CFSP), it is important to discuss the challenges posed by the contemporary restrictive measures regimes for those who have to comply with them, especially where respect for human rights within the procedural realities of the CFSP is at stake.[1]

  • There has been gradual evolution of the scope of human rights and the recognition of the protection of fundamental rights as one of the general principles of the EU law, the exclusion of the CFSP judicial review currently has to be interpreted narrowly and the CFSP exceptions providing for judicial review are interpreted broadly

Read more

Summary

Introduction

While European foreign ministers approved the new European Global Human rights restrictive measures (sanctions) regime in early December 2020, targeting perpetrators of human rights violations, regardless of location and nationality as part of the European common foreign and security policy (CFSP), it is important to discuss the challenges posed by the contemporary restrictive measures regimes for those who have to comply with them, especially where respect for human rights within the procedural realities of the CFSP is at stake.[1]. Part II introduces the challenges that measures cause to those concerned by them It introduces the EU Treaties’ bases for the adoption of restrictive measures under the CFSP and illustrates the challenges to sanctions compliance and the implementation of conflicting and parallel sanctions through examples from EU and Member States’ case law. They can target entities, groups or organisations or individuals involved in terrorist activities or supporting targeted policies.[11] Sanctions can be trade and restrictive measures, which are usually referred to as ‘sanctions’ they are not punitive in nature [27] They can be adopted by countries or international organisations through laws and regulations in pursuit of foreign policy and security objectives, including the fight against terrorism and nuclear proliferation. Sectors, sensitive products such as arms and dual-use goods and national persons where their assets are subject to freezes [13]

Overall impact of sanctions
Hierarchy of EU relevant CFSP sanctions regimes
UNSC sanctions
Implementation of UNSC sanctions resolutions within the EU
EU competences and the legal bases for issuing restrictive CFSP measures
EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Consideration
US sanctions and Examples of EU restrictive measures independent of the UNSC
Case law on Member States and EU restrictive measures independent of the UNSC
Conflicting and overlapping sanctions
Challenges to sending humanitarian funds into high risk jurisdictions
Restrictive Measures Judicial Review Challenges
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call