Restrictive Filling Pattern and Mortality: Comparison of Individual Patient Versus Literature Based Meta-Analyses

Abstract

patients hadNIHSS <1, 1/5NIHSS= 15, 1/5NIHSS= 18. In conclusion, standard 24h Holter monitoring only detects 4.9%of patientswith newor paroxysmalAF admittedwith AIS in sinus rhythm. Increasing the period of monitoring to 48 h will detect 7.3% more cases of significant AF. There is no correlation between stroke site, severity and the incidence of new onset or paroxysmal AF. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2008.05.205 205 Restrictive Filling Pattern and Mortality: Comparison of Individual PatientVersusLiteratureBasedMeta-Analyses Katrina Poppe1,2,3,4,5,6,∗, Rob Doughty1,2,3,4,5,6, C.M. Yu1,2,3,4,5,6, Miguel Quintana1,2,3,4,5,6, Jacob Moller 1,2,3,4,5,6, Allan Klein1,2,3,4,5,6, Greg Gamble1,2,3,4,5,6, Frank Dini 1,2,3,4,5,6, Gillian Whalley1,2,3,4,5,6 1 The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; 2 The Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China; 3 The Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; 4 HS Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 5 The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States; 6 Santa Chiara Hospital, Pisa, Italy Purpose: The restrictive mitral filling pattern (RFP) is the most severe form of diastolic dysfunction. We have performed standard literature-based meta-analyses (LMA) a l a a t M t r i t u s R t t v 1 d