Abstract

Abstract. Sequences of multiple modifying adjectives are subject to poorly understood lexical ordering restrictions. There are certain commonalities to these restrictions across languages, as well as substantive language variation. Ordering restrictions in Spanish are still under empirical debate, with some proposing strict ordering for direct modifier adjectives; others proposing broad ordering restrictions based on the contrast between intersective and non-intersective adjectives, and yet others raising the possibility that adjectival order is fully unrestricted. The goal of the present study is to examine corpus evidence for adjectival sequences. We look at both sequences of two postnominal adjectives (Noun +Adjective + Adjective, NAA sequences) as well as sequences of one prenominal, and one postnominal adjective (Adjective + Noun +Adjective, ANA sequences). The results from the NAA datasets clearly categorically confirms that relational adjectives are structurally closer to the noun. There is some evidence for an ordering bias along the line of the intersectivity hypothesis, but little else in term of hard evidence for restrictions. Additional ordering constraints appear once we incorporate the ANA datasets into the empirical picture. One interpretation is that these restrictions can be subsumed under an approach where evaluative adjectives have to occupy the prenominal restriction. In sum, the evidence is most compatible with the middle ground approach, but not with a fully articulated set of ordering restrictions.

Highlights

  • Sequences of multiple modifying adjectives are subject to poorly understood restrictions

  • To put the issue : What is the evidence available for adjective ordering in Spanish? Do we find evidence for a privileged position for relational adjectives, a point of general consensus? Do we find evidence for a broad level distinction between intersective and non-intersective adjectives, a point of agreement between Cinque (2010) and Demonte (1999)? do we find evidence for narrow ordering among intersective classes (Cinque 2010), or not (Sánchez 2018; Demonte 1999a,b)? is there an ordering within the non-intersective classes? Cinque predicts size to precede value, whereas Demonte suggest these two classes cannot co-occur unless linked by coordination

  • 4.3 Results Relational adjectives were by far the most common type. They are overwhelmingly the type attested in first position. Because they are so frequent, the most common pairings consisted of a relational adjective followed by a subsequent contiguous relational adjective (280 tokens, 27% of the total data in the Ngram corpus; and 148 tokens, 22% of the Corpus data) other pairings emerge

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sequences of multiple modifying adjectives are subject to poorly understood restrictions. Some patterns seem to hold crosslinguistically, while others have been proposed to be language-specific One leading proposal (Cinque 2010) holds that attested orders reflect an underlying syntactic cartography within the structure of noun phrases, which in some languages is expressed as a mirror image pattern, resulting from cyclic (roll up) movement. English has near categorical use of a prenominal position for adjectives, whereas the primary position for Spanish adjectives is postnominal. This is true of other Romance languages, but the postnominal order is especially dominant in the case of Spanish (Scarano 2005; Rizzi et al 2013). The contrast between (1) and (2) illustrates the mirror image pattern

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.