Abstract

In this experiment we investigated how individual differences in orientation towards built vs. nature environment as well as noise sensitivity affect psychological and physiological restoration in a constructed urban park, urban woodland and city centre of Helsinki, Finland. The participants, 30-61-year-old healthy women (N = 83), visited each study site once. The experiment consisted of a 15-min viewing session, followed by a 30-min walking session in each environment. We measured restorative effects: perceived restorative outcomes, vitality, and blood pressure in these three environments. The data were analysed in SAS with a linear mixed model. We found significant differences between environments in psychological restorative effects, but not in blood pressure. The urban-nature orientedness, and to a lesser extent noise sensitivity, modified the effect of environment on restoration. In conclusion, individual characteristics affect psychological restoration provided by various urban environments. Varying needs of individuals should be taken into account in city planning.

Highlights

  • Research has shown that contact with the natural environment supports human health and wellbeing

  • In our experiment we examine how the urban-nature orientedness and sensitivity to noise are related to restorative effects in different urban green environments, urban park and urban woodland)

  • We examined the effect of urban-nature orientedness and noise sensitivity on restorative effects in different urban environments: city centre, urban park and urban woodland

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research has shown that contact with the natural environment supports human health and wellbeing. The green spaces have positive effects on mood and cognitive functioning (Bowler et al, 2010; Bratman et al, 2015; Van den Berg et al, 2003), people prefer nature when emotionally tired (Korpela et al, 2010), and urban green areas help to reduce attentional stress and enhance psychological recovery Of the physiological health effects, the research evidence suggests that being in nature has positive effects on blood pressure, heart rate, skin conductivity, muscle tension and cortisol levels (Hartig et al, 2003; Horiuchi et al, 2013; Laumann et al, 2003; Park et al, 2010; Tsunetsugu et al, 2007).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.