Abstract

A method of chest wall restriction imposed for 30 minutes demonstrated a mean (SD) decrease of 42 (14) per cent in forced vital capacity (FVC) during restrictor application. Following the application of chest wall restriction, 30 healthy subjects then underwent a 15 minute treatment with either Flutter VRP1 (Flutter) or breathing exercise with end-inspiratory hold (BE) after chest wall restriction release. Both Flutter and BE applied for 15 minutes immediately restored FVC to pre-restriction values. Tidal breathing control subjects demonstrated a clinically small but statistically significant decrease in FVC of 3 per cent (p<0.001). Visual analogue assessment of each treatment technique showed BE to be the subject- preferred technique for lung volume restoration. This study shows that in normal subjects, Flutter and BE are equally effective in restoring FVC and superior to tidal breathing.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call