Restoration of atrial mechanical function after maze operation in patients with structural heart disease

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Background The maze operation is effective for the restoration of sinus rhythm; however, restoration of atrial mechanical function has not been demonstrated in all patients. Methods Maze operations were performed in 32 patients (13 men, 19 women; mean age 47.1 ± 9.0 years) combined with valvular surgery ( n = 25), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) ( n = 3), and others ( n = 4). At 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the operation, prospective serial Doppler echocardiographic examination was carried out to determine the presence of atrial mechanical function. Results Sinus rhythm was restored and maintained during the follow-up period in 26 (81%) patients; in 22 patients this was due solely to the operation, whereas in four patients an antiarrhythmic agent was needed to maintain sinus rhythm. Another four patients showed paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) despite treatment with an antiarrhythmic agent. Right atrial mechanical function was restored in all 30 patients with sinus rhythm or paroxysmal AF; in 19 (63%) of these, left atrial mechanical function was restored. In patients with restored left atrial mechanical function, peak A velocity (A) and A/E ratio (A/E) of mitral inflow were significantly lower than in the 16 postoperative control patients (A: 0.46 ± 0.14 m/sec vs 0.75 ± 0.29 m/sec, p < 0.01; A/E: 0.40 vs 0.80, p < 0.01). In patients with left atrial mechanical function, the duration of AF was significantly shorter than in patients without left atrial mechanical function (1.9 ± 2.9 years vs 7.1 ± 3.0 years, p < 0.01), but there were no significant differences in left atrial size and volume. Conclusions The maze operation could be safely added to standard open heart surgery for the correction of underlying structural heart disease. The rate of conversion to sinus rhythm resulting solely from the operation might be lower than the rates previously reported with only the duration of AF adversely affecting the restoration of left atrial mechanical function. Considering the fact that not all patients converted to sinus rhythm show atrial mechanical function, the role of the maze operation in the prevention of systemic embolism, with subsequent improvement in survival, requires further study. (Am Heart J 1998;136:1070-4.)