Abstract

Wetlands are valuable ecosystems because they harbor a huge biodiversity and provide key services to societies. When natural or human factors degrade wetlands, ecological restoration is often carried out to recover biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES). Although such restorations are routinely performed, we lack systematic, evidence-based assessments of their effectiveness on the recovery of biodiversity and ES. Here we performed a meta-analysis of 70 experimental studies in order to assess the effectiveness of ecological restoration and identify what factors affect it. We compared selected ecosystem performance variables between degraded and restored wetlands and between restored and natural wetlands using response ratios and random-effects categorical modeling. We assessed how context factors such as ecosystem type, main agent of degradation, restoration action, experimental design, and restoration age influenced post-restoration biodiversity and ES. Biodiversity showed excellent recovery, though the precise recovery depended strongly on the type of organisms involved. Restored wetlands showed 36% higher levels of provisioning, regulating and supporting ES than did degraded wetlands. In fact, wetlands showed levels of provisioning and cultural ES similar to those of natural wetlands; however, their levels of supporting and regulating ES were, respectively, 16% and 22% lower than in natural wetlands. Recovery of biodiversity and of ES were positively correlated, indicating a win-win restoration outcome. The extent to which restoration increased biodiversity and ES in degraded wetlands depended primarily on the main agent of degradation, restoration actions, experimental design, and ecosystem type. In contrast, the choice of specific restoration actions alone explained most differences between restored and natural wetlands. These results highlight the importance of comprehensive, multi-factorial assessment to determine the ecological status of degraded, restored and natural wetlands and thereby evaluate the effectiveness of ecological restorations. Future research on wetland restoration should also seek to identify which restoration actions work best for specific habitats.

Highlights

  • Wetlands harbor significant biodiversity [1] and supply crucial ecosystem services (ES) [2,3], which are defined as the benefits that people obtain from ecosystems [4]

  • Restoration significantly enhanced the diversity of vertebrates (+53%), vascular plants (+45%), and terrestrial (+17%) and aquatic (+15%) invertebrates, but it had no significant effect on macroinvertebrate diversity

  • Our results showed that changes in biodiversity positively correlated with changes in ES supply in a variety of wetlands, ecosystem types and scales, which supports a functional role for biodiversity in the supply of ES [7,9]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wetlands harbor significant biodiversity [1] and supply crucial ecosystem services (ES) [2,3], which are defined as the benefits that people obtain from ecosystems [4]. Wetlands occupy less than 9% of the Earth’s terrestrial surface, they contribute up to 40% of global annual renewable ES [5]. Despite their importance to human societies, wetlands are rapidly being degraded and destroyed [5], threatening the ecosystem and biodiversity on which wetland ES depend. Most studies evaluating wetland restoration, including a recent meta-analysis [7], have not directly assessed ES recovery or how well restoration methods work for diverse types of organisms

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call