Abstract

Brain network analysis has been widely applied in neuroimaging studies. A hyper-network construction method was previously proposed to characterize the high-order relationships among multiple brain regions, where every edge is connected to more than two brain regions and can be represented by a hyper-graph. A brain functional hyper-network is constructed by a sparse linear regression model using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) time series, which in previous studies has been solved by the lasso method. Despite its successful application in many studies, the lasso method has some limitations, including an inability to explain the grouping effect. That is, using the lasso method may cause relevant brain regions be missed in selecting related regions. Ideally, a hyper-edge construction method should be able to select interacting brain regions as accurately as possible. To solve this problem, we took into account the grouping effect among brain regions and proposed two methods to improve the construction of the hyper-network: the elastic net and the group lasso. The three methods were applied to the construction of functional hyper-networks in depressed patients and normal controls. The results showed structural differences among the hyper-networks constructed by the three methods. The hyper-network structure obtained by the lasso was similar to that obtained by the elastic net method but very different from that obtained by the group lasso. The classification results indicated that the elastic net method achieved better classification results than the lasso method with the two proposed methods of hyper-network construction. The elastic net method can effectively solve the grouping effect and achieve better classification performance.

Highlights

  • Evidence from numerous anatomical and physiological studies suggests that cognitive processing depends on the interaction among distributed brain regions (Sporns, 2014)

  • To solve the problem of the grouping effect among brain regions, we propose two alternative methods to improve the construction of a hyper-network: (1) the elastic net (De Mol et al, 2008; Furqan and Siyal, 2016; Teipel et al, 2017) and (2) the group lasso method (Friedman et al, 2010a; Yu et al, 2015; Souly and Shah, 2016)

  • The results indicated that for both the major depressive disorder (MDD) and the control group, the edge degrees of hyper-edges constructed by lasso and elastic net methods most lied in Equations (2)–(7), and the distributions were close

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Evidence from numerous anatomical and physiological studies suggests that cognitive processing depends on the interaction among distributed brain regions (Sporns, 2014).

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call