Abstract
BACKGROUND: Indirect calorimetry (IC) is the gold standard method to assess individual resting energy expenditure (REE). However, due to its high cost and time demand, predictive equations are largely used to estimate energy requirements, which may vary according to different body compositions and health status. Crossfit® is a training program created by Greg Glessman in 1995 and consists of performing high intensity functional movements. Some studies have already reported increase of metabolic rates in this population. PURPOSE: To measure REE in Crossfit® practitioners, using IC, and verify the most appropriate predictive equation to estimate this variable. METHODS: 142 Crossfit® practitioners, 91 female (64.1%), aged between 16-59 years, underwent nutritional assessment, including weight, height, waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI). Body composition was measured by a portable ultrasound. REE was measured by IC (mREE) and predicted by six different equations (pREE): Harris-Benedict, World Health Organization (WHO), Henry and Rees, Cunningham (1980), Cunningham (1991), and Mifflin-St.Jeor. Statistical analysis were carried out by Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test, Student’s t test and Bland and Altman plots. RESULTS: The mean age was 33.0 ± 6.3 years of age, without difference between men and women. The mean BMI was 24.7 ± 3.5 kg/m2. The mean mREE was 1583.2 ± 404.4 kcal, and the pREE ranged from 1455.5 ± 230.9 kcal to 1711.3 ± 285.5. The best REE predictive equations for Crossfit® practitioners were the Cunningham (1991) (P=0.338), WHO equation (P=0.494) and Harris-Benedict (P=0.705). Harris-Benedict presented the smaller difference comparing with IC (12.9 ± 307.6 kcal), Cunningham (1991) showed better adequacy (102.5%) and WHO equation presented greater percentage of accuracy (59.9%). The same equations remained adequate when data were stratified by gender. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that Cunningham (1991), WHO (1985) and Harris-Benedict (1919) equations were the most appropriated REE equations for Crossfit® practitioners. Further studies should investigate more suitable methods to determine the energy requirements in Crossfit® and should, perhaps, create and propose a specific equation for this population.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.