Abstract
The 1980s and 1990s saw several international political and social developments that gave rise to the ideology of democracy, which focuses on issues such as equal human rights and human dignity. Furthermore, globalisation gave rise to a worldwide ethnic renaissance with a focus on the nurturing of diversity. These developments led to the increased valuing and validation of variation, including language variation. Given this democratisation of the world, the relevance of standard languages, which are undeniably ideological in nature, is increasingly being questioned. Does a language variety which only serves the economic, social and political elite of a speech community still have a role to play in a democratic society? Or should we accept that this will inevitably lead to the destandardisation of languages? These are the questions that gave rise to discussions on the restandardisation of languages. The literature is, however, not yet clear on what is meant by restandardisation, as no unambiguous definition of this term exists as of yet. The aim of this paper is to give a clearer understanding of what restandardisation entails by discussing relevant literature on restandardisation, standardisation, destandardisation and other aspects of language planning in order to provide an unambiguous definition of restandardisation. By specifying its language planning and democratic properties, this paper aims to define restandardisation as democratising language planning, i.e. a language planning activity with the ability to transform the standard language in order to make it a democratic tool of communication that serves the entire speech community and in which all the speakers of the different varieties of a language are represented.
Highlights
Standardisation has been defined, researched and expounded extensively in literature over the last few decades, the concept of ‘restandardisation’ is still a relatively unexplored area of investigation in sociolinguistics
Wade (1996:13) states that passive restandardisation is a vital prerequisite for active restandardisation15; in other words, the language attitudes that speakers have towards other varieties first have to change before the changes brought about in the standard language, through the process of restandardisation, will have an effect on speakers’ linguistic behaviour
Restandardisation has been defined as democratising language planning by indicating the degree to which restandardisation differs from standardisation and destandardisation, while engaging both of these processes
Summary
Standardisation has been defined, researched and expounded extensively in literature over the last few decades, the concept of ‘restandardisation’ is still a relatively unexplored area of investigation in sociolinguistics. Odendaal has been written about it since This has resulted in the lack of an unambiguous definition of the term. The aim of this paper is to define “restandardisation” by referring to relevant literature on restandardisation, standardisation, destandardisation and other aspects of language planning in order to explain what I understand the term to mean and which aspects, in my view, form a part of it. This is carried out against the backdrop of a changing perspective across the world regarding standard languages and a tendency towards destandardisation. By posing standardisation against destandardisation, the aim is to illustrate how restandardisation engages with both of these processes, and differs from them, by defining restandardisation as democratising language planning
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
